MS Dhoni was the victim of a dubious decision in Brisbane.
New Delhi: With close decisions going against India of late, current and
former cricketers feel it is high time the BCCI give its nod to the contentious
Decision Review System as refusal to accept technology is hurting the team
badly. ('Don't Make Excuses')
India were at the receiving end of at least five contentious umpiring
decisions in the lost first two Tests against Australia, prompting skipper
Mahendra Singh Dhoni to say that the tourists are being more hard done. (India
Buckle Under Johnson)
But he continued to hold the view that having DRS would not help the side's
cause too much. ('Dhawan Injury Caused Unrest Among us')
However, senior off-spinner Harbhajan Singh feels that it's time that India
accepted DRS in its current form as it would only help the team during close
Test matches.
"I believe it's time that we accepted the DRS as it will only benefit our
cause. If you look, in both Test matches, India were very competitive but there
were key moments when our boys got a raw deal," Harbhajan told PTI on
Sunday.
"I can recall four decisions. Shikhar's (Dhawan) caught behind in the second
innings of the first Test in Adelaide. (Cheteshwar) Pujara's caught behind in
the first innings of second Test followed by Rohit (Sharma) and Ashwin's
decision in the second innings. Had DRS been there, all these decisions were
sure to be overturned and we might have been in a winning position in both Test
matches," Harbhajan opined.
"Even if I take it for a fact that DRS is not foolproof and 100 percent
accurate, from a personal point of view, even 90 percent accurate DRS can get
you key decisions at key moments in your favour," said Harbhajan, who has 400
plus wickets in Test cricket.
However Harbhajan's one-time teammate and one of India's finest batsman VVS
Laxman is still not ready to warm up to DRS as he still believes that key issues
like full-fledged accuracy of HotSpot or HawkEye still can't be determined.
"Any technical foolproof system to provide accurate decisions is always
welcome. I am not against DRS, but the system is still a long way from being
foolproof," Laxman is still not ready to accept DRS in its current form.
"I am not convinced about the HotSpot or the HawkEye, which projects the
predictable path of the ball for the LBW decisions. As and when these two vital
issues of the decision review process are set in order, we can seriously
contemplate agreeing to the use of DRS," Laxman added. Laxman's first Test
captain Mohammed Azharuddin, however, is of the opinion that if ICC has approved
DRS, then it's not a great thing if BCCI is turning a blind eye.
"When other cricket playing nations are not averse to using it (DRS) then why
is India ignoring it?," questions Azhar, who has played 99 Tests for India.
"Like in this Test match (Brisbane Test), so many decisions went against
India, they could have gone in their favour. I mean even the Australians were at
the receiving end but India suffered a lot. I strongly feel that either you
completely use technology or just ignore it," Azhar added.
Azhar feels that if for easy run-out decisions, umpires take help of
technology then why not for more difficult ones.
"Go back to the old days when decisions were taken by on field umpires and
one had to accept them the way it was. I really don't know what is the
problem.
"Once the ICC has approved it, then everyone should fall into its ambit. For
a simple run-out or an elementary decision the umpires go to the third umpire
even if the batsman is three yards short of his crease. I fail to understand
this half-hearted approach.
"Either fully use technology or completely ignore it. When it is approved by
ICC then what is the problem in using. It is only beneficial."
Another former India captain Dilip Vengsarkar admitted that he wasn't in
favour of DRS earlier but is ready to accept it after umpiring howlers in
Adelaide and Brisbane.
"I was of the opinion that DRS is not 100 percent foolproof but it seems we
have to go for the technology now. A lot of easy decisions have gone against us
and that has hurt us badly in the series.
"There were some questionable bat-pad decisions and catches as the umpiring
has not been up to the mark. We have had some glaring mistakes especially in the
first Test. It's high time that we go for DRS now," he opined. Legendary spinner
Erapalli Prasanna and former India opener Chetan Chauhan also spoke in the same
vein about accepting DRS in its current form.
"From the beginning, I have been vocal about using DRS. Why isn't it being
used? Ask the BCCI," was Prasanna's terse comment on the subject.
Chauhan on his part said, "Cricket is a game where one bad decision can
change the course of the match. You don't want to lose out on key moments due to
umpiring errors. I am a fan of DRS from the beginning. Let's use it in its
current form and let the technical team work on it to make it even better. Right
now, what we have is good enough to be used," Chauhan said.
Ajit Wadekar was also overwhelmingly in favour of DRS as "India have been the
worst sufferers for not using DRS. Teams like England and Australia have
benefitted and we must also start using DRS."
Former India batsman and chief national selector Chandu Borde feels that one
or two technical glitches in DRS do not make it completely unacceptable.
"One or two glitches in the technology can be improved. Other countries are
using it. Why not us? Who is suffering, technology or cricket? Technology
impacts every other walk of life. Why not cricket if it is for the betterment of
the game and it will satisfy players public every one," Borde opined.
He also cited the example of how front-foot no-ball was opposed worldwide and
now has been universally accepted.
"When front foot no ball rule was introduced there was opposition. Now
everyone accepts it. Similarly accepting DRS will also help us in improving the
game," Borde said.